Farm Contractor & Large Scale Farmer
    Twitter LinkedIn
    • FREE Email Newsletters
    • About Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Contact Us
    Twitter LinkedIn
    Podcast
    Farm Contractor & Large Scale Farmer
    • News
      • Arable & Agronomy
      • Dealership News
      • Environmental Land Management Scheme/Policy
      • Event News
      • Health & Safety
      • Machinery
      • People
      • World News
    • Farm Machinery
      • Amenity & Maintenance
      • Cultivations
      • Drilling
      • Grassland Equipment
      • Harvesting
      • Muck & Slurry
      • Sprayers
      • Telehandlers
      • Tractors
      • Tractor of the Year
      • Tyres & Tracks
      • Whatever happened to?
    • Precision Farming
    • Markets & Policy
    • Profiles
      • National Arable and Grassland Awards
      • Company Profiles
      • Reader Profiles
    • Livestock
      • Beef
      • Dairy
      • Sheep
    • Magazines
      1. June 2025 issue
      2. May 2025 issue
      3. April 2025 issue
      4. March 2025 issue
      5. 2025 Tyre Developments supplement
      6. February 2025 issue
      7. National Arable and Grassland Awards supplement
      8. January 2025 issue
      9. December 2024 issue
      10. November 2024 issue
      11. October 2024 issue
      12. September 2024 issue
      13. August 2024 Issue
      14. 2024 Drills and Seeds supplement
      15. July 2024 Issue
      16. Cereals Supplement
      17. June 2024 Issue
      18. May 2024 Issue
      19. April 2024 Issue
      20. Tyres and Tracks Supplement
      21. March 2024 Issue
      22. National Arable & Grassland Award – Meet the Finalists
      23. February 2024 Issue
      24. January 2024 Issue
      25. December 2023
      26. Agritechnica Preview Supplement
      27. November 2023
      28. October 2023
      Featured

      June 2025 issue available now

      By Matthew TiltJune 2, 2025
      Recent

      June 2025 issue available now

      June 2, 2025

      May 2025 issue available now

      May 1, 2025

      April 2025 issue available now

      April 1, 2025
    • Events
    • Podcast
    Farm Contractor & Large Scale Farmer
    Beef

    QMS: Benefits of managing cows by condition score

    chrislyddonBy chrislyddonMarch 8, 20164 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email

    Managing suckler cows according to their condition score can have a huge impact on herd output and profitability, according to Dr Basil Lowman, Beef Specialist with SAC Consulting, a division of SRUC (Scotland’s Rural College).

    In two short videos launched by Quality Meat Scotland (QMS), Dr Lowman demonstrates how and why to condition score and also emphasises the importance of using this key management tool at this time of year, for both spring and autumn calving herds. The fact that cows which are too thin or too fat are more likely to have calving problems and be less fertile is well known, but there is huge potential for many more farmers to be effectively managing their herds according to cow condition score.

    “The national herd goes from lean to fat on an annual basis depending on grass growth and forage quality, and condition scoring simply reflects this. It is the variation within herds which is most important for farmers to deal with,” observed Dr Lowman.

    He points out that the vast majority of herds have cows with condition scores ranging from two to four. This difference is equivalent, in terms of energy available to the cow, to three big bales of silage. “Many farmers do not appreciate what a dense source of energy body fat is. Achieving the correct score at calving and mating will reduce feed costs as well as maximising output and potential.”

    The most crucial aspect of condition scoring, according to Dr Lowman, is that farmers take action once they have condition scored their cows. He says: “In the simplest form, farmers should take food from the fat to feed the thin in order to even out condition scores and improve productivity. Correct management at the critical stages of mating and calving offers huge benefits to output and profitability.” He also points out that there are simple techniques, such as dividing sheds using electric fence tape, which can allow farmers to group cows according to condition.

    He points out that long calving periods can make cow management tricky and, instead of following a whole-herd feeding policy, his advice is to divide the herd into those due to calve in the first month and later calvers. He reckons this split would normally be roughly two-thirds/one-third, and ideally the larger portion of the herd should be grouped according to condition score and fed accordingly. Further, that it is always worthwhile dealing with even a small number of overly thin or fat cows as, without attention, they are likely to be barren.

    The time of calving is important in setting condition scoring targets, as this can have an impact on fertility and how receptive the cow is to mating. Dr Lowman explains that cows calving in early spring should ideally have a score of 2.5 at calving because they are generally bulled as soon as they go out to grass so need to be in reasonable condition at turn out. However, those calving in late spring can afford to be leaner at a score of 2 as they will have the benefit of being bulled after a month or more on spring grass when it is at its best, and fertility peaks with the cows on a rising plane of nutrition.

    Autumn calvers generally find it more difficult to put on weight over the winter, and Dr Lowman recommends a calving condition score closer to 3 to allow for some weight loss before bulling. However, he warns: “The leaner a cow is, down to a score of 2, the more easily she will calve, so only target a score of 3 in the autumn if the cows and bull both have easy-calving characteristics, otherwise aim for 2.5 and provide a high-energy feed post-calving to compensate.”

    The target score at mating should be 2.5, regardless of the time of year, but Dr Lowman emphasises that a cow can put on half a score at grass and lose quarter of a score on winter forage within a month. In the new videos, Dr Lowman also advises farmers to handle 10 to 20 per cent of the cows in the herd, as visual assessment can be misleading due to gut shape and hair. Once they have a feel for the scores then the rest of the herd can be analysed visually.

    To view the two videos visit www.qmscotland.co.uk or Quality Meat Scotland’s Facebook page.

    Tweet
    Share
    Share
    Pin
    Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email
    Previous ArticleExport success for beef cuts and offal
    Next Article Growth at Horsch and a positive outlook
    chrislyddon

    Read Similar Stories

    Hi-Spec to introduce new diet feeder at Royal Highland

    June 16, 2025

    Livestock ban from Hungary and Slovakia after confirmed foot and mouth case

    March 10, 2025

    Campaign launched to battle against bluetongue

    March 5, 2025
    Most Read Stories

    ADR UK to bring Tianli tyres into UK

    June 16, 2025

    Delinked payments to be cut significantly over the next two years

    June 16, 2025

    Mzuri closes down UK production

    June 16, 2025
    Farm Contractor & Large Scale Farmer

    The UK's leading agricultural machinery journal

    Twitter LinkedIn
    © 2024 MA Agriculture Ltd, a Mark Allen Group company

    Privacy Policy | Cookies Policy | Terms & Conditions

    • Farmers Weekly
    • AA Farmer
    • Poultry News
    • Pig World

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.